Home Web internet China Eastern crash investigation considers intentional action – sources

China Eastern crash investigation considers intentional action – sources

0

WASHINGTON, May 17 (Reuters) – Investigators investigating the crash of a China Eastern Airlines plane (600115.SS) are examining whether it was due to intentional action on the flight deck, without any evidence of a technical malfunction, informed two people. on the question said.

The Wall Street Journal reported earlier Tuesday that flight data from one of the Boeing 737-800’s black boxes indicated that someone in the cockpit intentionally crashed the plane, citing people familiar with the preliminary assessment. American officials.

Boeing Co (BA.N), the jet’s maker, and the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) declined to comment and referred questions to Chinese regulators. The Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC), which is leading the investigation, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Join now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

The Boeing 737-800, en route from Kunming to Guangzhou, crashed in the mountains of the Guangxi region on March 21 after a sudden drop in cruising altitude, killing all 123 passengers and nine crew. on board.

It is the deadliest air disaster in mainland China in 28 years. Read more

The pilots did not respond to repeated calls from air traffic controllers and nearby planes during the rapid descent, authorities said. A source said Reuters investigators were investigating whether the accident was a “voluntary” act.

On Wednesday, screenshots of the Wall Street Journal story appeared to have been censored on both Chinese social media platform Weibo and messaging app Wechat. The hashtag topics “China Eastern” and “China Eastern black boxes” are banned on Weibo, which cited a violation of laws, and users cannot share messages about the incident in group chats on Wechat.

The CAAC said on April 11 in response to internet rumors of a deliberate crash that the speculation had “seriously misled the public” and “interfered with the work of investigating the crash”.

A woman who asked to be identified only by her last name, Wen, who lost her husband in the crash, told Reuters on Wednesday she had not seen the Wall Street Journal report but hoped the survey results would be released soon.

Wen said she and other family members of the victims signed an agreement with China Eastern that included a point on compensation, but she declined to say how much was offered.

China Eastern did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Wall Street Journal said the airline said in a statement that no evidence had emerged that could determine whether or not there were issues with the plane.

NO TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

The 737-800 is a widely used predecessor to Boeing’s 737 MAX, but lacks the systems that have been linked to fatal 737-MAX crashes in 2018 and 2019 that led to the MAX’s long grounding.

China Eastern grounded its entire fleet of 737 to 800 planes after the crash, but resumed flights in mid-April, a move widely seen at the time as ruling out any new immediate safety concerns over the busiest model. from Boeing.

In a summary of an unpublished preliminary accident report last month, Chinese investigators pointed to no technical recommendation for the 737-800, which has been in service since 1997 with a strong safety record, experts said.

NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said in a May 10 interview with Reuters that investigators from the board and Boeing had traveled to China to help with the Chinese investigation. She noted that the investigation to date had not found any safety issues requiring urgent action.

Homendy said if the council had any safety concerns it would “issue urgent safety recommendations”.

The NTSB helped Chinese investigators examine the black boxes at its US lab in Washington.

Boeing shares closed up 6.5%.

A final report on the causes could take two years or more to compile, Chinese officials said. According to analysts, most accidents are caused by a cocktail of human and technical factors.

Deliberate accidents are exceptionally rare in the world. Experts noted the last hypothesis left open whether the action stemmed from a pilot acting alone or the result of a struggle or intrusion, but sources stressed that nothing had been confirmed.

The cockpit voice recorder was damaged in the crash and it is unclear whether investigators were able to extract any information from it.

In March 2015, a Germanwings co-pilot deliberately flew an Airbus A320 into a French mountain, killing all 150 people on board.

French investigators discovered that the 27-year-old suffered from a “psychotic depressive episode”, hidden from his employer. They then called for better mental health guidelines and stronger peer support groups for pilots.

Join now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by David Shepardson in Washington, Tim Hepher in Paris and Abhijith Ganapavaram in Bengaluru; additional reporting by Stella Qiu and Martin Quin Pollard in Beijing; Editing by Leslie Adler, Marguerita Choy and Richard Pullin

Our standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.